一年来，我认真执行学校教育教学工作计划,转变思想,积极探索,改革教学,在继续推进我校“自主——创新”课堂教学模式的同时,把新课程标准的新思想、新理念和物理课堂教学的新思路、新设想结合起来,转变思想,积极探索,改革教学,收到很好的效果。
一、课程标准走进我的心，进入我的课堂 。
怎样教物理,《物理课程标准》对物理的教学内容,教学方式,教学评估教育价值观等多方面都提出了许多新的要求。无疑我们每位物理教师身置其中去迎接这种挑战,是我们每位教师必须重新思考的问题。因此我不断的学习让我有了鲜明的理念,全新的框架,明晰的目标,而有效的学习对新课程标准的基本理念,设计思路,课程目标,内容标准及课程实施建议有更深的了解,本学期我在新课程标准的指导下教育教学工作跃上了一个新的台阶。
二、课堂教学,我加强了师生之间学生之间交往互动,共同发展。
本学年我深知我们每位物理教师都是课堂教学的实践者,为保证新课程标准的落实,我把课堂教学作为有利于学生主动探索的学习环境,把学生在获得知识和技能的同时,在情感、态度价值观等方面都能够充分发展作为教学改革的基本指导思想,把物理教学看成是师生之间学生之间交往互动,共同发展的过程,在教研组长、集体备课组长的带领下,紧扣新课程标准,和我校“自主——创新”的教学模式。在有限的时间吃透教材,分工撰写教案,以组讨论定搞,每个人根据本班学生情况说课、主讲、自评;积极利用各种教学资源,创造性地使用教材公开轮讲,反复听评,从研、讲、听、评中推敲完善出精彩的案例。积极进行了实验探索问题的实践，在集体备课中,这种分合协作的备课方式,既照顾到各班实际情况,又有利于教师之间的优势互补,从而整体提高备课水平,课前精心备课,撰写教案,实施以后趁记忆犹新,回顾、反思写下自己执教时的切身体会或疏漏,记下学生学习中的闪光点或困惑,是教师最宝贵的第一手资料,教学经验的积累和教训的吸取,对今后改进课堂教学和提高教师的教学水评是十分有用。
较强的物理思想方法得于渗透。学生在观察、操作、实验、讨论、交流、猜测、分析和整理的过程中,公式的形成、获得、应用了然于心。提倡自主性“学生是教学活动的主体,教师成为教学活动的组织者、指导者、与参与者。”这一观念的确立,灌输的学习就大大削弱。八年级 电路图型连接、各种物理电学公式的计算、实验都体现学生自主探索、研究。突出的过程性,注重学习结果,更注重学习过程以及学生在学习过程中的感受和体验。这样的探索实验让学生成了学习的主人,学习成了他们的需求,学中有发现,学中有乐趣,学中有收获,这说明:设计学生主动探究的过程是探究性学习的新的空间、载体和途径。 教学活动兼顾到知识教育与人文教育的和谐统一,而这些都并非是一朝一夕就能完完成的。需要每一位我不断学习、不断修炼,提高文化水平与做人境界,这将是一个长期而非常有价值的努力过程。研讨 反思 将公开课上的精华延伸运用于日常教学实践 我在总结自己教学的同时,不断反思教学,以科研促课改,以创新求发展,不断地将公开课上的精华延伸运用于日常教学实践,把仍在困惑这我的许多问题,有个在认识。努力处理好物理教学与现实实践的联系,努力处理好应用意识与解决问题的重要性,重视培养学生应用物理的意识和能力。重视培养学生的探究意识和创新能力。 常思考,常研究,常总结,以科研促课改,以创新求发展, 进一步转变教育观念,坚持“以人为本,促进学生全面发展,打好基础,培养学生创新能力”,以“自主——创新”课堂教学模式的研究与运用为重点,努力实现教学高质量,课堂高效率。
三、创新评价,激励促进学生全面发展。
怎样提高学生成绩,我把评价作为全面考察学生的学习状况,激励学生的学习热情,促进学生全面发展的手段,也作为教师反思和改进教学的有力手段,对学生的学习评价,既关注学生知识与技能的理解和掌握,更关注他们情感与态度的形成和发展;既关注学生物理学习的结果,更关注他们在学习过程中的变化和发展。抓基础知识的掌握,抓课堂作业的堂堂清,采用定性与定量相结合,定量采用等级制,多鼓励肯定学生。坚持以教学为中心,强化对学生管理,进一步规范教学行为,并力求常规与创新的有机结合,促进教师严谨、扎实、高效、科学的良好教风及学生严肃、勤奋、求真、善问的良好学风的形成。
通过我一年来不断的工作,我的物理教学工作取得了很好的成绩,而连续两个学期我的物理教学成绩都位于全校前列,一份耕耘,一份收获。成绩的取得离不开领导的支持和全体老师的帮助,教学工作苦乐相伴。以后我将本着“勤学、善思、实干”的准则,一如既往,再接再厉,把工作搞得更好。
Key to Performance Performance: Self - Assessment and Objectives.Performance work is an important part of enterprise HR work. The key to the following two points: First, give employees the opportunity to self-assessment; the second is to make the staff's goals and the company's goals are consistent.
Give employees the opportunity to self-assess
First, the employee's self-assessment as part of the company's performance appraisal process, is very important. To encourage employees to participate in the company's performance appraisal process and ensure an effective dialogue between managers and employees, you can use the same form in the company's regular performance review process, or create a slightly modified version.
Second, the purpose of employee self-assessment is to obtain employees on their performance of self-point of view. This is a powerful way to give employees the opportunity to speak throughout the performance appraisal process. Sometimes, managers worry about the value of self-assessment, that employees will simply give their praise and higher ratings in order to try to raise their actual rating. Experience has shown that the opposite trend is real, and when we evaluate ourselves, we tend to be more severe than others.
Third, the manager's personal view of the employee, self-assessment is a very valuable way for the company to get more information about employee performance. It can also help managers stay ready to deal with differences in opinion or opinion and gain insight into employee expectations.
So that the objectives of the staff consistent with the company's goals
The importance of creating a SMART (concrete, measurable, achievable, relevant, time-bound) goal is to associate the employee's goals with higher-level organizational goals, and you create for employees' This is a very important "context." This helps employees understand why their work is important and how their work contributes to the success of the organization as a whole.
Practice has proved that the goal of the staff with a higher level of departmental goals, the objectives of the branch and the goal of the entire enterprise linked to create a personal goal and organizational goals consistent with the "big environment" for the development of staff performance is crucial Important, but also allow employees to feel that their work is very important.
回首一年，本人虽未轰轰烈烈，但也踏踏实实。现总结如下：
一、为了明天的教育而充实自我
新课程实验已经进入正式实验阶段，为了保证新课程实验能健康顺利开展,重要的是教师要树立的新课程理念，要以新课程的理念指导实践，在实践中进一步领悟新理念。为此，我非常重视学习，平时认真阅读教学杂志上有关新课程改革的文章，学习教科研专著，认真听讲座，积极参加校本培训，通过一系列的学习，自己的教学理念进一步更新，对新课程理念感悟也在一步步加深。我深切体会到：当一名优秀语文教师的不易，因为传统的教学方法已经不适应当前的课改，从教学理念的转变到教学方式的转变是一个质的飞跃，不学习则落伍。语文学科涉及的知识面广泛，它对教师提出了更高的要求，除了学习理论文章外，我还学习文化知识方面的书籍。为了提高自己的课堂教学水平，我还虚心向同行们学习，积极参与教研组的备课、听课、评课、观摩、研讨活动，不断吸收新鲜血液，以适应现代化教育的需要，使自己的课堂教学跟上时代发展的脉搏。我平时还及时进行实践反思，写出教后感，每学期二、三十篇，撰写教育教学论文数篇。
二、用全新的教育理念，指导课堂教学改革
今年下半年新课程在我校启动，对于我这个一线的老教师来说既是一种全心的挑战，又是一次考验。为了使自己在新课程改革中不落伍，我努力钻研业务，努力提高自身素质，积极探索新的教学思路，新的教学模式。平时认真钻研业务，在“五认真”上下功夫。严把备课关，做到备大纲，备教材，备学生，精心设计每堂课。在教学中本着“教是为了不教”的观念，以“用好老教材，实践新理念，使每个学生生动活泼、自主和谐发展”作为自己追求的目标。努力创设语言训练的条件，让学生在有限的时间和空间里主动地进行听说读写的语言活动，使课堂成为学生施展才华的舞台，让学生在“自主、合作、探索”中学习。而我本人则隐退至后台充当学生“学习的促进者、指导者”。把学习的主动权力还给学生。现在学生在新课前都能认真预习，特别是能在网上查资料，在图书管找资料，课堂上思维活跃，发言热烈，常常高潮迭起。
课堂上我努力让学生感受到一种亲切、和谐、活跃的气氛;我努力使自己成为学生的亲密朋友，让教室也转变成为学生的学堂;我努力让学生的个性得到充分的展现与培养。所以在课堂上学生或质疑问难，或浮想联翩，或组间交流，或挑战权威。师生互动，生生互动，组间互动，环境互动，在有限的时间内，每一位学生都得到了较为充分的锻炼和表现的机会。教室中再没有阴暗冰冷的“死角”，课堂上充满着流动的阳光，平等、和谐与交流共存，发现、挑战与沉思同在。学生思维活跃，闪光点频频，他们已成为课堂上真正的主人。班内学生普遍反应喜欢上语文课。一节课40分钟，往往觉得太短了，下课后还围着我讨论问题。
新课改不但要提高学生的课内阅读能力，还要提高学生的课外的阅读能力和写作能力。我的授课既源于教材，又不唯教材，我经常利用午间活动进行读书体会交流，优秀作文赏评，还有新闻发布会，故事会等,最近又成立了研究性学习小组.。让学生在互动中求知，在活动中探索，既轻松地掌握了知识，又潜移默化地培养了能力。学生的整体素质有了质的提高。特别是学生看课外书的兴趣大大增强。每天学生们都围着图书箱借图书看，有的学生已经在看《水浒》、《三国演义》、《红楼梦》等名著。在增加阅读量上还增加了写作量，一学期学生写小作文几十篇。随着训练量的增加，学生的写作水平也在提高，发表、获奖文章很多，居年段之首。
一个班级中难免有学习态度不端正、接受能力差的学习困难生。对于这样的学生我循循善诱、耐心辅导，特殊照顾。
三、民主管理，让学生享受成功的快乐
作为一名班主任，我的管理原则是创建活而不乱，严而不死的良好班风班貌。这学年我觉得自己班主任工作最有特色是——民主管理，让学生享受成功的快乐。
充分发扬民主，让全体学生积极参与管理，千方百计调动他们的积极性和创造性，培养他们独立自主的精神和自我管理的能力，逐步完成由教师管理向学生管理的过渡，真正扮演好引路人和协调者的角色。我的班务工作主旨是：让每一位学生都快乐地度过在学校的每一天。爱每一个孩子，使他们因为有我这样的班主任，每天能快乐充实。在工作中把成功教育这一思想灵活地运用到班级管理的实践中去，改变陈旧的教育模式，变埋怨、责怪学生为相信每一个学生，变教师对学生外压式的强制教育为学生内调式的自我教育，变片面追求分数的教育为争取每个学生多方面成功的教育。注意工作的方式方法，努力尝试尊重学生、发现学生，使他们在“我能行”的指导下，个个充满自信，能够抬起头大胆往前走，有勇气迎接风雨，乐于在困难中微笑，人人有成功的体验。
平时，充分发挥队员的自我管理能力，发动大家参加班级管理的各项活动，让每个人都有机会履行班级管理职责，人人都有自己的发言权，增强责任感和参与意识，为管理好班级献出自己的一份力量，使全体学生成为班级管理的主人。如，班级目标的确定、班队活动计划的制订、主题队会的设计、雏鹰争章台的布置、争章考核细则以及各类先进评比标准等，都充分利用晨间活动、班队活动，发动全班同学献计献策，取得共识。因为学生愿意干的事，干起来热情高，干劲大，成效也好。如：陆悦、张艺帆、杨奕琦、朱颖婷等同学经常放弃休息时间整理图书，出黑板报等。在中队活动中，力求少一些老师的具体指导，多一些学生的互相探讨;少一些集体的共同规矩，多一些学生的自我规范;少一些共性需求，多一些个性发展。
从毕业参加工作快半年了，这次竞聘，也为我提供了一次反思工作的机会。回顾自己近半年的工作，并认真分析，现将半年来工作总结汇报如下：
自七月中旬到**学院工作以来，我从学生到老师，面临的很多事情都是新的，要想尽快适应新的岗位，首先是学习，向领导学习，学习他们严谨务实的工作作风;向学院的同事们学习，学习他们辛勤工作、乐于奉献的优良传统。在此，也感谢院领导和各位老师的热心帮助，在你们的关心领导下，使我的工作得以顺利开展并为我将来的发展提供了宝贵的经验。
下面我从以下几个方面来介绍我这一段时间的工作以及以后的工作打算。 首先，工作之初，顺利完成了14级新生的迎新工作。从新生分班、分宿舍到发放书籍、钥匙、缴费、办理户籍，军训再到体检，从选班委到找个别学生谈话„„这些看似琐碎的工作，就是辅导员工作的几个小方面。也正是通过这些事情让我更进一步认识到成为一个优秀的辅导员并不是一件容易的事情，需要自己在各个方面逐步的完善，补充自己的知识空缺，提高自己的工作能力。
通过带新生，我认识到，学生刚进入大学，具有很强的可塑性，但是把他们培养成适合社会需要的人才需要四年的时间，这需要我们付出极大的耐心和心血。大一学生思想还不成熟、对自己的学习和生活都感到比较迷惘，他们最需要的是给自己一个合理的定位，重新认识自己。针对这些情况，我与14级新生开展了多次心理谈话，与他们谈人生打算、谈对学习和生活环境的适应。鼓励他们多观察生活、多参与活动，尽快使自己成熟起来。如，有些学生对自己的专业迷茫，就鼓励他们课后多问相关专业课老师。
其次，在工作中抓好班风建设，注意培养学生干部能力。班风反映一个学院、一个学校的精神风貌，也体现这一个学校的管理水平。让学生形成、积极、团结、向上的班风，是我们必须要努力做的事情。同时注意培养学生干部，发挥好他们的带头作用，有的学生干部虽然工作热情但做事毛躁，有的则畏首畏尾，就要时时提醒，适时批评。对学生工作应以鼓励为主，在批评时一定要有理有据，让学生做到心服口服。
再次，我觉得最近工作最有成效的就是找一些同学进行心理谈话。作为学院的分管心理工作的辅导员，如何做好这份本职工作是我经常思考的问题。找学生谈话就要找到问题的切入点，找出解决问题的方法，提前作好充分的准备全面了解学生反映的问题，寻找根源，从中找出问题的解决办法。心理普查之后，应学校要求对一些学生进行了相应的心理谈话。这次谈话有意识的淡化自己作为一名老师的角色，以一名兄长的身份对他们进行同辈心理咨询，取得了良好效果。通过最近有的学生主动找我谈话，说明了学生对我这种工作方式的认可，以后我将继续努力。
最后，在学校迎评工作中尽量分担学院的一些日常工作。从暑假值班一直到最近上交材料，都力求将最新、最完整的信息整理好，配合学院迎评工作。整理学生心理健康、诚信档案，为迎评尽绵薄之力。同时收交党费、帮助一些老师分担一些日常工作，我想做好这些日常事务也是服务学校、提高自己能力的重要组成部分。
对于竞聘理由和将来工作打算我是这样认为的：
选择**学院是因为通过这近半年的工作，我深深体会到了这是一个积极向上的集体，领导关心属下，同事一团和气，也正如姜院长所讲“想干事、能干事的人都能在**学院找到自己的发展空间”。选择是经过深思熟虑的，是甘心情愿的。另一个原因是：学生素质都很高，我对他们期望很大，希望能与他们一起成长，爱他们，所以我舍不得离开**学院。
虽然我们院有心理学专业，但是目前我们院没有一间专门的心理咨询室，同时很多学生找我谈话时都表示不愿意在学办吵杂的环境中对话，因此我最近的打算就是希望能配合相关领导、老师建立一间完备的心理谈话室。
最后我要说的是，我喜欢辅导员工作，喜欢，希望能在这方土地上耕耘，收获更多。
In many enterprises performance appraisal, there is a "staff self-assessment" link, which is the first employee of their performance in the assessment period, and then submitted to the direct superior to adjust, and finally draw the employee's performance scores. In the use of direct superior performance evaluation system, the purpose of employee self-assessment is nothing more than two: 1, the fastest quantitative data sources can be quantified; 2, reflects the staff participation in performance appraisal; However, if the assessment of employees Assessment without a clear understanding of it, it will lead to significant deviation of the assessment results, or even failure. We know that the performance appraisal may be a variety of errors, such as the different leaders of different personal scales, the average tendency, etc., then the self-assessment link, which led to the factors that lead to errors it?
First, the personality of each person is different from the self-assessment scale is very different. For example, some employees self-confidence, their own evaluation of high, some people feel inferior, their evaluation on the low side. In addition, some people pursue perfection, strict requirements on their own, and some others have passed, these two categories of people to their own scale certainly different. Also, some old employees of the company and colleagues know very clearly, scoring when its capability, and new employees do not know other people's shallow depth, to their scoring when there is not much reference to speak of.
Second, psychological research shows that most people are overconfident."Do not make a normal fool," an example of this book mentioned that we often hear a lot of people say that they "not on the phase", that is, according to the photos did not look good. In fact, the photo is an objective reflection of our appearance, and each of us in the mirror when it will be special (and may be unconscious or habitual) to choose the best angle, that is more than a layer of subjective Factors in it, which led to our look in the mirror look better than the photos. So in fact, the staff part of the self-assessment on the provision of such a "mirror" to our staff to the beauty, this error which is self-evident.
Third, the staff self-assessment of the score, the assessment will do a great impact on the scoring. Have the experience of "bargain" people know that if you see the stall on a package, and my heart that probably worth 100, but the mouth asking price, the boss said 500, if you really want this package, bigMost people only dare to 300 or 400 pieces to cut. This is the so-called "anchor effect", the negotiation inside the "first offer, without anger in each other's situation, the higher the better" is the meaning, because the first bid will greatly grasp the initiative, so that the other psychological expectationsResulting in great changes. Employee self-assessment actually gave the examiner a chance to take the lead in the bidder, and whether the assessment due to face or other considerations, are likely to be the "quote" effect, so that the assessment results error. We in the actual work of human resources, but also did find this phenomenon, a company several departments staff performance appraisal scores, without exception, no less than its self-rated scores.
Based on the above analysis, we will find that the department leaders get the self-evaluation scores mixed with too many subjective factors, so that can not be filtered through technical means, and this score will have a great impact on the assessment; Confident employees have a high score, and sometimes due to the need for mandatory distribution, those who require their own strict, scoring low staff has become a victim, because their scoring low, the final score is difficult to be brought up leadership. In the assessment of the indicators can not quantify the more components, or different departments in different parts of the work of employees, the lack of uniform measure of the time, this situation is particularly serious.
So, companies in the performance evaluation of the actual operation, how to solve these problems I mentioned above? Many people may be from the "increase the proportion of quantifiable indicators," "to strengthen the assessment and assessment of those who training, But in practice, it will only increase the workload and complexity of performance appraisal, implementation easier said than done? In fact, just look back to see the implementation of the two purposes of self-evaluation .Self-evaluation and implementation of self-evaluation, , We will find a simple solution: the relatively objective quantifiable indicators, the implementation of "employee self-evaluation", while maintaining a "fast data source" - in fact only data sources, but also embodied in the form "Employee participation"; and not to quantify the subjective evaluation of indicators, the assessment by the direct scoring, do not give employees self-evaluation (and thus in this link error) opportunity.
We know that performance appraisal in human resources work is a huge project, the implementation of the highest cost, companies should seize the main contradiction, step by step, and in the initial stage, but not for the form of trapped. So is slightly Jun policy for some enterprises initially set up performance management system, simply cancel the self-evaluation session, thus avoiding the link error, but also to a certain extent reduce the workload and complexity of the assessment for the next Step smooth implementation of the well prepared.
Of course, the front said that the main business in the initial stage of performance management situation. When companies meet the following conditions: First, the implementation of the more smooth performance management, implementation costs can be effectively controlled; Second, the formation of a good performance within the company culture, we understand the performance management is more uniform, their own evaluation More objective; Third, the department leaders generally have a clear understanding of the lower levels and independent judgments; we can think that enterprises have entered the advanced stage. At this point to carry out a real staff self-assessment, it will further mobilize the enthusiasm of employees and the importance of performance, thus forming a virtuous circle of performance management.
In summary, the core issue of employee self-evaluation, not how to do a good job, but when to engage in, when should not engage in the problem. It is necessary to distinguish the stage of development of enterprise performance management and select the key points that should be solved at each stage, and will not achieve the multiplier effect without being trapped in form. From the initial stage of performance management to the advanced stage, each enterprise has a long way to go, and this process can not be achieved overnight.